Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (1.56 seconds)
Shingar Chand vs The State Of Punjab And Another on 19 September, 2013 cites

Union Of India Etc. Etc vs K.V. Jankiraman Etc. Etc on 27 August, 1991

"34. Similarly, the reliance placed by Mr. Dhruv Mehta on the judgment of this Court in K.V. Jankiraman's case (supra) is also misplaced. In this judgment, this Court considered the circumstances under which the banks could resort to the "sealed cover procedure", when considering the claims of the eligible candidates for promotion. The court also examined the impact of departmental punishment for assessment of the suitability of an employee for promotion. The relevant ratio of this Court is as under :
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 1332 - P B Sawant - Full Document

Dr. R. Bhardwaj vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 9 July, 2003

As per the record, the petitioner was promoted only on temporary basis. When the temporary promotion is made, it does not mean that the petitioner has got a vested right for regular promotion. Rather from the perusal of the record, it is clear that the petitioner was promoted to the post of Executive Engineer on purely temporary basis, without prejudice to the result of pending disciplinary proceedings against him, for a period of six months or till he was approved by the Screening Committee and the Commission whichever would be earlier, vide order dated Kumar Virender 2013.10.04 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No. 10928 of 1991 20 21.07.1986. The said order was never challenged by the petitioner and he accepted the conditional temporary promotion. The Screening Committee and the Commission considered the case of the petitioner and found him unfit for promotion. Hon'ble Supreme Court in R.P. Bhardwaj vs. Union of India and others, (2005) 10 SCC 244 has held that when the ad hoc promotion made by scrutiny of records by a Screening Committee whereas regular promotion is made by the Committee headed by the members of Public Service Commission, the consideration and scrutiny for regular promotion would obviously be on a different footing from that for ad hoc promotion.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Lucknow Cites 14 - Cited by 10 - Full Document
1