Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.19 seconds)Unni Krishnan, J.P. And Ors. Etc. Etc vs State Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors. Etc. Etc on 4 February, 1993
In view of aforesaid, it appears that the law relied on by the petitioner entirely relates to education as right of a citizen to such education upto primary level has been held to be a fundamental right in the ease of Unni Krishnan (supra).
Mohini Mohan Banerjee And Ors. vs Secretary Of State For India In Council ... on 20 May, 1921
In the case of Purnima Banerjee (supra), also the right of students regarding admission was the subject-matter under consideration and in that factual background the writ petition was held maintainable.
Ram Murti Saran vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 7 April, 1970
10. The case of Ram Saran (supra), was decided upon considering the function of co-operative society and the law relating thereto.
K. Krishnamacharayulu & Ors vs Sri Venkateswara Hindu College Of ... on 21 February, 1997
The other reference of the petitioner is of the case of Krishnamacharyaulu (supra). The said case was considering the applicability of the pay scale following the Government Order and in that factual background, if was held that the teachers were seeking enforcement of order issued by the Government and there was a public interest created. With the said finding the writ petition was held maintainable.
Ashok Kumar Chawla vs Central Board Of Secondary Education ... on 3 December, 1997
13. I find that the circumstances involved in the present case are identical to the case of Ashok Kumar Chawla (supra). The present institution is also a private body run by a registered society and is affiliated with the Central Board of Secondary Education which also does not get aid or grant from the Government nor it has been created by any statute. The statement made in the counter affidavit of the present writ petition in this respect also is relevant.
1