Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.24 seconds)
Bal Vikas Vidyalaya vs The State Of Bihar on 7 April, 2025 cites

Shyam Sel And Power Limited vs Shyam Steel Industries Limited on 14 March, 2022

As regards, the judgments rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Shyam Sel & Power Ltd. & Anr. (supra) and the one rendered in the case of Shah Babulal Khimji (supra), referred to by the learned senior counsel for the respondents no. 5 and 6, this Court finds that the same are also distinguishable in the facts and circumstances of the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 66 - B R Gavai - Full Document

Shah Babulal Khimji vs Jayaben D. Kania And Anr on 10 August, 1981

As regards, the judgments rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Shyam Sel & Power Ltd. & Anr. (supra) and the one rendered in the case of Shah Babulal Khimji (supra), referred to by the learned senior counsel for the respondents no. 5 and 6, this Court finds that the same are also distinguishable in the facts and circumstances of the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 92 - Cited by 536 - S M Ali - Full Document

Nelson Motis vs Union Of India And Another on 2 September, 1992

23. It is equally a well settled law that in case the appellate Court has been constituted in words of the widest amplitude and the legislature has not limited its jurisdiction, as is the case herein, all orders passed by the Inspector General, Registration under the Rules, 2018 shall definitely be appealable before the Member, Board of Revenue. Reference, in this connection has rightly been made by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner to the judgments rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of Ebrahim Aboobakar & Anr. (supra), Shiur Sakhar Karkhana Patna High Court CWJC No.14697 of 2023 dt.07-04-2025 43/46 (Pvt.) Ltd. (supra) and the one rendered in the case of Nelson Motis (supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 332 - L M Sharma - Full Document

Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society, ... vs M/S. Swaraj Developers & Ors on 17 April, 2003

Reference in this connection has been made to Patna High Court CWJC No.14697 of 2023 dt.07-04-2025 13/46 the judgments reported in (1992)4 SCC 711 (Nelson Motis v. Union of India & Anr.), (2003)6 SCC 659 (Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society vs. Swaraj Developers & Ors.) and the one reported in (2005)2 SCC 271 (Nathi Devi vs. Radha Devi Gupta).
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 1808 - A Pasayat - Full Document

State Of Maharashtra vs Mahboob S. Allibhoy & Anr on 10 April, 1996

As regards, the judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the State, rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Mahboob S. Allibhoy and Another (supra), this Court finds that reliance upon the said judgment is misplaced inasmuch as in the said case, what the Hon'ble Apex Court was considering was Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, which itself postulates that an appeal shall lie as of right from any order or decision of the High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction to punish for contempt, meaning thereby that in case the High Court passes an order in exercise of its jurisdiction to punish any person for contempt of Court, then only an appeal shall be maintainable under sub- section(1) of Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. However, this is not the situation in the present case inasmuch as under Rule 22 (ii) of the Rules, 2022, there is no rider/fetter and the jurisdiction of the appellate Court has neither been limited nor does it specify the nature/type of orders which are appealable Patna High Court CWJC No.14697 of 2023 dt.07-04-2025 44/46 whereas Rule 22(ii) of the Rules, 2018 postulates that appeal can be filed against all orders passed by the Inspector General, Registration, under the Rules, 2018.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 78 - N P Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 Next