Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.53 seconds)Section 13 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 14 in The Competition Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 399 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
K. Arockiyaraj vs The Chief Judicial Magistrate on 27 August, 2013
10. The decision of the aforesaid Full Bench of the Madras High Court
has further been relied upon by the same High Court in the matter
of T.C. Ramadoss and another v. The Chief Manager and
Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, Chennai and others 4
wherein Satish K. Agnihotri, J, as then His Lordship was, speaking
for the Division Bench, while following the decision in K.
Arockiyaraj (supra) held that the legislators have made it clear that
4 AIR 2015 Madras 67
W.P.(C)No.1705/2017 &
W.P.(Art. 227)No.345/2017
Page 9 of 11
in any area other than a metropolitan area, the District Magistrate
of the concerned area will have jurisdiction to exercise power under
Section 14 of the Act, 2002, but, in metropolitan area, it is only the
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, who has the jurisdiction to exercise
power under Section 14 of the Act, 2002. The Division Bench
further held in para 10 as under: -
T.C. Ramadoss vs The Chief Manager & Authorised Officer on 29 January, 2015
10. The decision of the aforesaid Full Bench of the Madras High Court
has further been relied upon by the same High Court in the matter
of T.C. Ramadoss and another v. The Chief Manager and
Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, Chennai and others 4
wherein Satish K. Agnihotri, J, as then His Lordship was, speaking
for the Division Bench, while following the decision in K.
Arockiyaraj (supra) held that the legislators have made it clear that
4 AIR 2015 Madras 67
W.P.(C)No.1705/2017 &
W.P.(Art. 227)No.345/2017
Page 9 of 11
in any area other than a metropolitan area, the District Magistrate
of the concerned area will have jurisdiction to exercise power under
Section 14 of the Act, 2002, but, in metropolitan area, it is only the
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, who has the jurisdiction to exercise
power under Section 14 of the Act, 2002. The Division Bench
further held in para 10 as under: -
Indian Overseas Bank vs M/S.Sree Aravindh Steels Ltd on 9 September, 2008
In the said
judgment it is held that the legislature does not seem to
have entrusted the functions to the Chief Judicial
Magistrate in non-Metropolitan Areas, although such
function has been entrusted to the Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate, a Judicial Officer in metropolitan areas.
Md. Ashraf Ali vs Union Of India on 22 August, 2017
I
am in respectful agreement with the view taken by the Madras High
Court and respectfully disagree with the view taken by the Kerala
High Court in Muhammed Ashraf (supra).