Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)
Manjit Kaur Widow Of Late Balraj Singh ... vs The Employee State Insurance ... on 12 March, 2012 cites

Regional Director, E.S.I. Corporation vs L. Ranga Rao And Ors. on 24 June, 1981

Similar was the view held by the Karnataka High Court in Regional Director, ESIC Vs. L. Ranga Rao 1982 ILLJ 29 where a notional extension of the time and place from the actual place of employment was applied to treat an injury as employment injury. The only decision that is still required to be examined is the decision of Regional Director ESIC and another Vs.Francis De Costs and another 1994 (Suppl) IV SCC 102, where the Supreme Court was dealing with the case of a person having an accident outside the factory and outside the office hours and the Hon'ble Supreme Court rejected that there was a causal connection between the accident and the employment.
Karnataka High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Management Of Oriental Transport ... vs Mr. B.T. Ramakrishna And Ors. on 10 August, 2005

5. It would be seen, therefore, that the employment injury need not necessarily be in the place of employment. It need not again be within the hours of employment itself. Certain notional extension is always possible so long as the proximity to employment in terms of time and place exist. In this case, the petitioner was well within the duty hours but was going towards home after leaving the bus at the shed and he had perforce to return to his place of employment. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner also refers to a judgment of the Kerala High Court in Management of Oriental Transport Ltd. Vs. B.T. Ramakrishna and another etc. 2006(1) SCT 228 where a workman C.W.P. No.4012 of 2004 -4- staying in a bus for commencing his trip early morning went out to take bath but drowned in the stream while taking bath before commencing his duty. The Division Bench held that it must be taken as an accident arising out of his employment.
Karnataka High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 1 - N Kumar - Full Document

Employees' State Insurance ... vs Purushothaman on 3 July, 2001

In Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs. Purushothaman 2002 (1) ACJ 675, the accident had occurred while the employee was travelling in the transport provided by the employer while he was going towards his house. The Court ruled that the accident had taken place in the course of employment. The difference in this case was that the petitioner was going in his private vehicle and not in the vehicle of the employer. Again the accident was after the duty hours but however, the Supreme Court held that there was a notional extension of the time and space when it regarded the death as resulting in the course of employment. The place of accident was not even the place of work. The accident was again beyond the office hours. Even then the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that it was an employment injury.
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1