Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.19 seconds)
Ranjit Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 9 August, 2018 cites

Kavita Kumari Kandhw And Ors. vs State Of Jharkhand And Ors. [Alongwith ... on 1 May, 2006

2. It was pointed out that this issue is no more res-integra and it has been decided by this Court in the case of Kavita Kumari Kandhaw & Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors., reported in 2006 (2) JCR 512 (Jhr), holding that in view of the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court referred therein, the backward class of one State cannot be deemed to be so in relation to other State and the certificate, issued by one State, is not valid for other State.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 12 - S J Mukhopadhaya - Full Document

Sudhakar Vithal Kumbhare vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors. on 23 March, 2001

4. Learned counsels for the appellants has drawn our attention towards the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sudhakar Vithal Kumbhare Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors., reported in (2004) 9 SCC 481, wherein the fact was that the tribe 'Halba' was recognized as Schedule Tribe in the District of Chhindwara, in the State of Madhya Pradesh. Subsequently, after reorganization of the State, District Chhindwara came in the State of Maharashtra, but caste 'Halba' continued to be recognized as Schedule Tribe, in the State of Maharashtra also. However, the caste certificate, issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh to the applicant in the said case was not recognized by the State of Maharashtra, and the matter went up to the Hon'ble Apex Court, where the question was formulated as follows:-
Bombay High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 129 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Madhu Sudan Jha And Md. Nisar Alam vs The State Of Jharkhand And Ors. on 19 May, 2006

6. Subsequently, another matter came up before this Court in Madhu Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors., reported in (2011) 1 AIR Jhr R 450, wherein the fact was that the parents of the petitioner were the residents of the successor State of Bihar, and prior to the bifurcation of the State, the father was posted in Bokaro Steel City. Thus, the petitioner, who was born and brought up at Bokaro Steel City, claimed to be the bona fide resident of State of Jharkhand. The Schedule Caste Certificate granted to the petitioner by the State of Bihar, was not recognized in the State of Jharkhand on the same ground, and the matter came before this Court.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 8 - M Y Eqbal - Full Document
1