Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.89 seconds)The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Section 95 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
New India Assurance Compafiy vs Shri Satpal Singh And Ors on 2 December, 1999
30. While stating that the submissions of learned counsel for insurance
company could not be sustained, the High Court dismissed the appeal of the
insurance company following Satpal Singh (supra).
The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923
Section 149 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs Brij Mohan & Ors on 15 May, 2007
14. The inevitable conclusion, therefore, is that
provisions of the Act do not enjoin any statutory
liability on the owner of a vehicle to get his vehicle
insured for any passenger travelling in a goods
carriage and the insurer would have no liability
therefor.
[See also Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Brij Mohan & Ors. 2007 (7)
SCALE 753]
CA @ SLP (C) Nos.7237-7239 of 2003
The New India Assurance Company Limited ... vs Padam Singh Son Of Shri Girwar Singh ... on 21 September, 2007
The learned counsel for the Insurance Company
submitted that the issue involved in these appeals
is squarely covered by the decision of the Supreme
Court in the case reported in New Indian
Assurance Company Ltd. v. Satpal Singh, 2000
ACJ. 1 wherein their Lordships held that under the
Motor Vehicles Act 1988 all insurance Policies
covering third party risks are not required to
exclude gratuitous passengers in the Vehicle
though Vehicle is of any type or class.
In view of the proposition of law down by
the Supreme Court in the decision stated supra,
these appeals are dismissed. No costs.