Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.25 seconds)The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Bhagwant Kishore Joshi on 17 April, 1963
There is nothing in the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code
which precluded the appellant (Inspector of Police, Vigilance) from
taking up the investigation. The fact that the said police officer
prepared the FIR on the basis of the information received by him
and registered the suspected crime does not, in our view, disqualify
him from taking up the investigation of the cognizable offence. A suo
motu move on the part of the police officer to investigate a
cognizable offence impelled by the information received from some
sources is not outside the purview of the provisions contained in
Sections 154 to 157 of the Code or any other provisions of the Code.
The scheme of Sections 154,156 and 157 was clarified thus by Subba
Rao, J. speaking for the Court in State of U.P. vs. Bhagwant
Kishore [AIR 1964 SC 221].
Section 20 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 29 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1