Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.24 seconds)
Dr. Kailash Narayan Mewafarosh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Department ... on 18 April, 2018
cites
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Mohammad Shujat, Ali & Ors. Etc vs Union Of India & Ors. Etc on 3 May, 1974
"39. This Court had also observed that
the right of promotion should not be
confused with mere chance of
promotion. Though the right to be
considered for promotion was a
condition of service, mere chances of
promotion were not. See Mohd. Shujat
Ali v. Union of India, [1975 1 S.C.R.449].
Ramchandra Shankar Deodhar & Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 12 November, 1973
graduate Supervisors from the erstwhile
Hyderabad State for promotion, was
reduced : originally it was fifty percent,
then it became thirty-three and one third
per cent, then one in eighteen and
ultimately one in twenty-four. The right
to be considered for promotion was not
6 WP.4852.2015
affected but the chances of promotion
were severely reduced. This did not
constitute variation in the condition of
service applicable immediately prior to
November 1, 1956 and the proviso to
Section 115, sub-section (7) was not
attracted. This view is completely
supported by the decision, of a
Constitution Bench of this Court in
Ramchandra Shankar Deodhar & Ors. v.
The State of Maharashtra [(1974) 1 SCC
317]."
Reserve Bank Of India, Bombay vs C.T. Dighe And Others on 27 July, 1981
See also in this connection the
observations in R.S. Deodhar v. State of
Maharashtra [(1974) 2 SCR 216] at p.
230 of the Reports: (SCC p. 329) and
Reserve Bank of India v. C.T. Dighe,
[1982 1 S.C.R. 107], 121-122."
Paluru Ramkrishnaiah & Ors. Etc vs Union Of India & Anr on 28 March, 1989
7 WP.4852.2015
(9) In "Paluru Ramkrishnaiah and others
Vs. Union of India and Another [(1989) 2
SCC 541]", it is held:
U.O.I.& Ors vs G.S.Grewal on 28 May, 2014
(10) In "Union of India and others Vs.
Colonel G.S. Grewal [(2014) 7 SCC 303]", it
is held that:
Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Drugs And Cosmetics Act, 1940
State Bank Of Mysore vs G.P. Thulasi Bai on 24 July, 1985
What happened in State of
Mysore v. G. B. Purohit (supra) was that
the districtwise seniority of Sanitary
Inspectors was changed to Statewise
seniority and as a result of this change,
the respondents went down in seniority
and became very junior. This, it was
urged, affected their chances of
promotion which were protected under
the proviso to Section 115, sub-section
(7). This contention was negatived and
Wanchoo, J., as he then was, speaking on
behalf of this Court observed: "It is said
on behalf of the respondents that as
their chances of promotion have been
affected their conditions of service have
been changed to their disadvantage. We
see no force in this argument because
chances of promotion are not conditions
of service." Now, here in the present
case, all that happened as a result of the
application of the Andhra Rules and the
enactment of the Andhra Pradesh Rules
was that the number of posts of
Assistant Engineers available to non-