Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Banking Service Recruitment Board, ... vs V. Ramalingam And Ors. on 3 December, 1997
Para 11: .... Once it is held that the appellants had the requisite jurisdiction to fix the cut-off marks, the necessary corollary thereof would be that it could not be directed to lower the same. It is trite that it is for the employer or the expert body to determine the cut-off marks. The court while exercising its power of judicial review would not ordinarily intermeddle therewith. The jurisdiction of the court, in this behalf, is limited. The cut-off marks fixed will depend upon the importance of the subject for the post in question. It is permissible to fix different cut-off marks for different categories of candidates. (See Banking Service Recruitment Board v. V. Ramalingam [(1998) 8 SCC 523]".
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Ram Pravesh Singh & Ors vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 22 September, 2006
In the decision relating to Ram Pravesh Singh and others v. State of Bihar and others [JT 2006 (12) SC 209], the Supreme Court set out the parameters of the concept of Legitimate Expectation. The following passage found in paragraph 14 may be usefully extracted below:
Article 335 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Union Of India & Others vs S. Vinodh Kumar & Others on 18 September, 2007
In a recent judgment of the Supreme Court reported in 2007 AIR SCW 5989 [Union of India and others v. S. Vinod Kumar and others], it was held that the prescription of qualification is prerogative of an employer and the Court power is very limited. The relevant passage found in paragraphs 10 and 11 read as follows:
1