Maulana Mohd.Amir Rashadi vs State Of U.P.& Anr on 16 January, 2012
Keeping in view the above-said facts and circumstances, moreso, the
fact that in the present case, the entire amount of which the complainant
was duped i.e., Rs.9,999/- has already been repaid by the petitioner to the
complainant even as per the affidavit of the complainant dated 08.10.2021
(Annexure P-1), reference of which has been made in para 3 of the
2 of 3
::: Downloaded on - 27-11-2021 03:59:08 :::
-3-
CRM-M-48957-2021
impugned order and also the fact that the petitioner has been in custody
since 06.09.2021 and the there are as many as 12 witnesses, none of who
have been examined and, thus, the trial is likely to take time moreso, in
view of the present pandemic and also in view of the judgment passed in
Maulana's case (supra), the present petition for grant of regular bail
deserves to be allowed.