Maneklal Mansukhbhai vs Jwaladutt Pilani on 12 February, 1946
The same principle has been expressed by the Bombay High
Court in Seth Maneklal Mansukhbhai v. Jwaladutt Rameshwar
Pillani(3) in which it was pointed out that it was
sufficient if the accounts were accepted and such acceptance
might be inferred by conduct of parties.
The contention on behalf of the defendants is that there has
been a "stated" or "settled" account in this case and in the
ab. sence of fraud, mistake or any other sufficient
equitable ground it is not liable to be reopened at the
instance of the plaintiff. In connection it is necessary to
state that the expression "account
(1) (1741) 2 Atk. 251. (2)[1750-51) 2
Ves. (Son.) 239.