Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.83 seconds)
State vs Suresh Kumar on 4 May, 2009 cites

Dalbir Singh vs State Of Haryana on 15 May, 2008

Further the citation Dalbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana 2000 II AD (S.C.) 507 is perused wherein it is held that while considering the quantum of sentence to be imposed for the offence of causing death by rash or negligent driving of automobile, one of the prime consideration should be deterrence. A professional driver should not 22 FIR NO. 252/97 take a chance thinking that even if he is convicted he would be dealt leniently by the Court. He must always keep in mind the fear psyche that if he is convicted of the offence for causing death of a human being due to his callous driving of the vehicle he cannot escape from a jail sentence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 303 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Nageshwar Shri Krishna Choube vs State Of Maharashtra on 19 September, 1972

Further Ld. Counsel for accused has relied on the fact that photographs of the position of the vehicle are not taken and therefore as per citation AIR 1973 SC 165 title Nageshwar Vs. State of Maharashtra accused should be given benefit. The non taking of the photograph of the two vehicle at the spot is sufficiently explained by the prosecution that the said bridge was the 19 FIR NO. 252/97 only bridge to communicate between two opposite habituated area from which lot of interstate traffic used to pass and therefore both the vehicles had to be make to stand at different place for administrative convenience and for public good. In such circumstances of the case, I find the accused criminally negligent in his driving. Two views are not possible. Accused is held guilty u/s 279/304A IPC.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 60 - I D Dua - Full Document
1   2 Next