Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.67 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 308 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Kerala vs Capt. Samuel Mathew Parakkat on 12 January, 2010
"16. ........The considerations which normally weigh with the court in
granting bail in non-bailable offences have been explained by this
Court in State v. Capt.
Ram Govind Upadhyay vs Sudarshan Singh & Ors on 18 March, 2002
The same was reiterated in Ram
Govind Upadhyay v. Sudarshan Singh and others (2002) 3 SCC 598.
State Of Bihar vs Rajballav Prasad @ Rajballav Pd. Yadav @ ... on 24 November, 2016
31. After referring to various case laws and observing that in a
criminal trial, witnesses must be able to depose without fear, freely
and truthfully, in Rajballav Prasad case, this Court cancelled the bail
granted to the accused thereon. In para (24) of the judgment, it was
held as under:-
Panchanan Mishra vs Digambar Mishra & Ors on 17 January, 2005
"24. As indicated by us in the beginning, prime consideration before
us is to protect the fair trial and ensure that justice is done. This
may happen only if the witnesses are able to depose without fear,
freely and truthfully and this Court is convinced that in the present
case, that can be ensured only if the respondent is not enlarged on
bail. This importance of fair trial was emphasised in Panchanan
Mishra v. Digambar Mishra (2005) 3 SCC 143 while setting aside
the order of the High Court granting bail in the following terms: