Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.39 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 17 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
L.I.C. Of India & Anr vs Ram Pal Singh Bisen on 16 March, 2010
In the judgement passed in the case of "LIC Vs. Ram Pal Singh
Bisen" reported in (2010) 4 SCC 491 : (2010) 2 SCC (Civ) 191 : (2010) 1
SCC (L&S) 1072, it has been held that mere admission of a document in
evidence does not amount to its proof, in other words, mere marking of
exhibit on a document does not dispense with its proof, which is required
to be done in accordance with law. It has been held that under the law of
evidence also, it is necessary that contents of documents are required to be
proved either by primary or by secondary evidence. At the most, admission
of documents may amount to admission of contents but not its truth. It has
also been held that the contents of the document cannot be proved by merely
filing in a court. The paragraphs relevant for the purposes of this case are
quoted as under :-
The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Basant Singh vs Janki Singh And Ors on 2 August, 1966
In the judgement passed by the Hon'ble Supreme court in the case of
"Basant Singh v. Janki Singh" reported in (1967) 1 SCR 1 : (1967) 1 SCJ
476 : AIR 1967 SC 341 it has been held that an admission in a pleading can
be used only for the purpose of the suit in which the pleading was filed but
in other suits, this admission cannot be regarded as conclusive, and it is
open to the party to show that it is not true. The paragraphs relevant for the
purposes of this case are quoted as under:-
The Registration Act, 1908
Gorle Gouri Naidu (Minor) & Anr vs Thanarathu Bodemma And Ors on 9 January, 1997
79. So far as the judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the
respondents representing the plaintiffs is concerned, which is reported in
(1997) 2 SCC 552 (Supra), the same does not apply to the facts and
circumstances of this case. In the said case, the inter-parte earlier judgment
declaring the gift deed invalid was held to be binding on the parties even if
erroneous and the parties were estopped from challenging the validity of
gift in the subsequent suit.
Indian Companies Act, 1913
Ramabai Shriniwas Nadgir vs The Government Of Bombay on 8 November, 1940
"5. The High Court also observed that an admission in a
pleading can be used only for the purpose of the suit in which
the pleading was filed. The observations of Beaumont, C.J. in
Ramabai Shriniwas v. Bombay Government lend some
countenance to this view.