cites: 57248542

1 - 8 of 8 (3.00 seconds)

M/S.Brakes India Limited vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax on 14 March, 2017 cites

Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Kerala vs Pangal Vittal Nayak And Co. P. Ltd. on 22 August, 1968

6.As indicated right at the outset, the issue is covered in favour of the Assessee, by virtue of our judgment in the matter of Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai Vs. M/s.Shri T.P.Textiles Private Limited. As noticed above, the Karnataka High Court in CIT V. Rittal India (P.) Ltd., [2016] 66 taxmann.com 4 (Karnataka), has also taken the same view.

Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 52 - A N Grover - Full Document

Section 32 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 5344

Section 260A in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 20048

M/S. M.M. Forgings Limited vs The Additional Commissioner Of ... on 11 January, 2011

7.3.The Division Bench in M.M.Forgings case the said case was not concerned with the issue, with which, we are faced, that is, the right to carry forward the balance additional depreciation. Therefore, the judgment is completely distinguishable.

Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 6 - F M Kalifulla - Full Document

The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Cntl), ... vs M/S Hero Cycles Pvt. Ltd. Ludhiana on 28 August, 1997

8.3.In any case, according to us, the Circulars are not binding on the Court, though, they may be binding on the Revenue. [See CIT V. Hero Cycles Pvt. Ltd., (1997) 228 ITR 463 (SC)].

Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 619 - Full Document

Section 263 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 14008

Finance Act, 2015

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 1701

Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 2931

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results