Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.22 seconds)Section 28 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 28AB in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 112 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 114A in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Commissioner Of Cus. (P) vs Artherton Engg. Pvt. Ltd. on 10 January, 2001
11. Similar dispute relating to classification of the same item also existed in respect of the same importer in Mumbai. Mumbai Customs, however, assessed the item in question under 8th 05.11 against which the party went in appeal. The Commissioner (Appeals) decided in favour of the classification under Customs Tariff Heading No. 23.09, and allowed the appeal of the party with consequential relief to them. The Department went to the CESTAT against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), Mumbai, and CESTAT, Mumbai in its Order No. 128/2001-WZB/C-II dated 10.01.01 . in the case of Commissioner of Customs (P) Mumbai v. Artherton Engg. Pvt. Ltd. decided the classification under Customs Tariff Heading No. 05.11.
1