Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.22 seconds)
Ram Kumar Das Chela Raghuvar Das vs Board Of Revenue Allahabad And 5 Others on 24 January, 2025 cites

R. Rajanna vs S.R.Venkataswamy & Ors on 20 November, 2014

15. The recall of the compromise decree was sought on the ground that the same was obtained by playing fraud. Admittedly, the defendants no. 2 to 5 to be Suit under section 229-B read with section 209 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, which was compromised were not party to the compromise. In such view of the matter, the compromise was not lawful and binding upon the parties. The Apex Court in AIR 2015 SC 706 (R. Rajanna Vs. S.R. Venkataswamy) in para no. 11 has observed as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 86 - T S Thakur - Full Document

Sakal Singh And Ors. vs Smt. Devi And Anr. on 11 May, 1979

10. It is further submitted that the petitioner himself filed the application before the trial court for abating the case u/s 5(2)(a) of the C.H. Act on 23.6.2015. The trial court restored the proceedings of the suit by recalling the order dated 24.1.1972 and thereafter, abated the proceedings in consonance with the view of the FB decision reported in 1979(5) ALR 383 (Sakal Singh Vs. Smt. Devi).
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 5 - R B Misra - Full Document
1   2 Next