Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (3.10 seconds)Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of U.P. & Ors vs J.P. Chaurasia & Ors on 27 September, 1988
v. W.B. Registration Service Assn. [1993
Supp (1) SCC 153 : 1993 SCC (L&S) 157 : (1993)
24 ATC 403] , State of U.P. v. J.P.
Chaurasia [(1989) 1 SCC 121 : 1989 SCC (L&S) 71
: (1988) 8 ATC 929] , Union of India v. Pradip
Kumar Dey [(2000) 8 SCC 580 : 2001 SCC (L&S)
56] and State of Haryana v. Haryana Civil
Secretariat Personal Staff Assn. [(2002) 6 SCC
72 : 2002 SCC (L&S) 822] )
***
Randhir Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 22 February, 1982
42.4. Persons holding the same rank/designation
(in different departments), but having dissimilar
powers, duties and responsibilities, can be
placed in different scales of pay and cannot
claim the benefit of the principle of ‚equal pay
for equal work‛ (see - Randhir Singh v. Union of
India, (1982) 1 SCC 618, and State of
Haryana v. Haryana Civil Secretariat Personal
Staff Assn., (2002) 6 SCC 72). Therefore, the
principle would not be automatically invoked
merely because the subject and reference posts
have the same nomenclature.
S.C.Chandra & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 21 August, 2007
17. We must also place on record the fact that
in different phases of development of law by
this Court, relying on or on the basis of the
said principle, a clear cleavage of opinion has
emerged. Whereas in the 1970s and 1980s, this
Court liberally applied the said principle
without insisting on clear pleadings or proof
that the persons similarly situated with others
are equal in all respects; of late also; this
Court has been speaking in different voices as
would be evident from the following. This has
been noticed specifically by a Division Bench
of this Court in S.C. Chandra v. State of
Jharkhand [(2007) 8 SCC 279 : (2007) 2 SCC
(L&S) 897] , wherein it was held: (SCC p. 289,
para 21)
‚21. Learned counsel for the appellants have
relied on Article 39(d) of the Constitution.
State Of Haryaka And Anr vs Haryana Civil Secretariat Personal ... on 10 July, 2002
v. W.B. Registration Service Assn. [1993
Supp (1) SCC 153 : 1993 SCC (L&S) 157 : (1993)
24 ATC 403] , State of U.P. v. J.P.
Chaurasia [(1989) 1 SCC 121 : 1989 SCC (L&S) 71
: (1988) 8 ATC 929] , Union of India v. Pradip
Kumar Dey [(2000) 8 SCC 580 : 2001 SCC (L&S)
56] and State of Haryana v. Haryana Civil
Secretariat Personal Staff Assn. [(2002) 6 SCC
72 : 2002 SCC (L&S) 822] )
***
National Aluminium Co.Ltd.& Ors vs Ananta Kishore Rout & Ors on 8 May, 2014
(2007) 2 SCC (L&S) 897 : 2 SCEC 943] and National
Aluminium Co. Ltd. case [National Aluminium Co.
Ltd. v. Ananta Kishore Rout, (2014) 6 SCC 756 :
Union Of India And Others vs Pradip Kumar Dey on 9 November, 2000
v. W.B. Registration Service Assn. [1993
Supp (1) SCC 153 : 1993 SCC (L&S) 157 : (1993)
24 ATC 403] , State of U.P. v. J.P.
Chaurasia [(1989) 1 SCC 121 : 1989 SCC (L&S) 71
: (1988) 8 ATC 929] , Union of India v. Pradip
Kumar Dey [(2000) 8 SCC 580 : 2001 SCC (L&S)
56] and State of Haryana v. Haryana Civil
Secretariat Personal Staff Assn. [(2002) 6 SCC
72 : 2002 SCC (L&S) 822] )
***
Mewa Ram Kanojia vs All India Institute Of Medical Sciences ... on 9 March, 1989
42.8. If the qualifications for recruitment to
the subject post vis-à-vis the reference post are
different, it may be difficult to conclude that
the duties and responsibilities of the posts are
qualitatively similar or comparable (see Mewa Ram
Kanojia v. All India Institute of Medical
Sciences, (1989) 2 SCC 235) and State of
W.B. v. Tarun K. Roy, (2004) 1 SCC 347.In such a
case the principle of ‚equal pay for equal work‛
cannot be invoked.
Grih Kalyan Kendra Workers' Union vs Union Of India And Others on 9 January, 1991
If
these parameters are not met, parity cannot be
claimed under the principle of ‚equal pay for
equal work‛ (see -State of U.P. v. J.P.
Chaurasia, (1989) 1 SCC 121) and GrihKalyan
Kendra Workers' Union v. Union of India, (1991) 1
SCC 619.