Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (3.10 seconds)

State Of U.P. & Ors vs J.P. Chaurasia & Ors on 27 September, 1988

v. W.B. Registration Service Assn. [1993 Supp (1) SCC 153 : 1993 SCC (L&S) 157 : (1993) 24 ATC 403] , State of U.P. v. J.P. Chaurasia [(1989) 1 SCC 121 : 1989 SCC (L&S) 71 : (1988) 8 ATC 929] , Union of India v. Pradip Kumar Dey [(2000) 8 SCC 580 : 2001 SCC (L&S) 56] and State of Haryana v. Haryana Civil Secretariat Personal Staff Assn. [(2002) 6 SCC 72 : 2002 SCC (L&S) 822] ) ***
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 372 - K J Shetty - Full Document

Randhir Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 22 February, 1982

42.4. Persons holding the same rank/designation (in different departments), but having dissimilar powers, duties and responsibilities, can be placed in different scales of pay and cannot claim the benefit of the principle of ‚equal pay for equal work‛ (see - Randhir Singh v. Union of India, (1982) 1 SCC 618, and State of Haryana v. Haryana Civil Secretariat Personal Staff Assn., (2002) 6 SCC 72). Therefore, the principle would not be automatically invoked merely because the subject and reference posts have the same nomenclature.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 521 - O C Reddy - Full Document

S.C.Chandra & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 21 August, 2007

17. We must also place on record the fact that in different phases of development of law by this Court, relying on or on the basis of the said principle, a clear cleavage of opinion has emerged. Whereas in the 1970s and 1980s, this Court liberally applied the said principle without insisting on clear pleadings or proof that the persons similarly situated with others are equal in all respects; of late also; this Court has been speaking in different voices as would be evident from the following. This has been noticed specifically by a Division Bench of this Court in S.C. Chandra v. State of Jharkhand [(2007) 8 SCC 279 : (2007) 2 SCC (L&S) 897] , wherein it was held: (SCC p. 289, para 21) ‚21. Learned counsel for the appellants have relied on Article 39(d) of the Constitution.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 305 - A K Mathur - Full Document

State Of Haryaka And Anr vs Haryana Civil Secretariat Personal ... on 10 July, 2002

v. W.B. Registration Service Assn. [1993 Supp (1) SCC 153 : 1993 SCC (L&S) 157 : (1993) 24 ATC 403] , State of U.P. v. J.P. Chaurasia [(1989) 1 SCC 121 : 1989 SCC (L&S) 71 : (1988) 8 ATC 929] , Union of India v. Pradip Kumar Dey [(2000) 8 SCC 580 : 2001 SCC (L&S) 56] and State of Haryana v. Haryana Civil Secretariat Personal Staff Assn. [(2002) 6 SCC 72 : 2002 SCC (L&S) 822] ) ***
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 166 - D P Mohapatra - Full Document

Union Of India And Others vs Pradip Kumar Dey on 9 November, 2000

v. W.B. Registration Service Assn. [1993 Supp (1) SCC 153 : 1993 SCC (L&S) 157 : (1993) 24 ATC 403] , State of U.P. v. J.P. Chaurasia [(1989) 1 SCC 121 : 1989 SCC (L&S) 71 : (1988) 8 ATC 929] , Union of India v. Pradip Kumar Dey [(2000) 8 SCC 580 : 2001 SCC (L&S) 56] and State of Haryana v. Haryana Civil Secretariat Personal Staff Assn. [(2002) 6 SCC 72 : 2002 SCC (L&S) 822] ) ***
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 129 - Full Document

Mewa Ram Kanojia vs All India Institute Of Medical Sciences ... on 9 March, 1989

42.8. If the qualifications for recruitment to the subject post vis-à-vis the reference post are different, it may be difficult to conclude that the duties and responsibilities of the posts are qualitatively similar or comparable (see Mewa Ram Kanojia v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences, (1989) 2 SCC 235) and State of W.B. v. Tarun K. Roy, (2004) 1 SCC 347.In such a case the principle of ‚equal pay for equal work‛ cannot be invoked.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 99 - K N Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 Next