Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.30 seconds)
Dcit Circle-9(1), New Delhi vs Federal Mogul Goetze (India) Ltd., New ... on 16 September, 2022 cites

Dcit, New Delhi vs Federal Mogul Goetze India Ltd., Delhi on 20 April, 2017

Ltd. (supra); we decide the issue in dispute regarding disallowance of bank charges in the present appeal for AY 2012-13, in favour of assessee, and against Revenue. Accordingly, the 3rd ground of appeal in AY 2012-13, is dismissed. (F) In the result, both the appeals filed by Revenue are dismissed. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 16/09/2022.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 9 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

S. A. Builders Ltd. .. Petitioner vs Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) ... on 14 December, 2006

• S.A. Builders Ltd. vs CIT [2007] 288 ITR 1 (SC) • Sasoon J. David & Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs CIT [1979] 118 ITR 261 (SC) • Shahzada Nand & Sons vs CIT 108 ITR 358 (SC) • CIT vs Chandulal Keshavlal & Co. [1960] 38 ITR 601 (SC) (C.1.1) Ld. Counsel for the assessee also submitted that the disallowances in respect of club membership expenses was deleted by the Ld. CIT(A) in assessee's own case for Assessment Years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2014-15, and he added that Revenue was not in appeal against these orders of the Ld. CIT(A) on the issue of club membership expenses. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee further submitted that no additions are being made by the Assessing Officer in assessee's own case on account of club membership expenses, after AY 2014-15.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 1104 - M Katju - Full Document

Sassoon J. David & Co. (P) Ltd., Bombay vs C.I.T., Bombay on 3 May, 1979

• S.A. Builders Ltd. vs CIT [2007] 288 ITR 1 (SC) • Sasoon J. David & Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs CIT [1979] 118 ITR 261 (SC) • Shahzada Nand & Sons vs CIT 108 ITR 358 (SC) • CIT vs Chandulal Keshavlal & Co. [1960] 38 ITR 601 (SC) (C.1.1) Ld. Counsel for the assessee also submitted that the disallowances in respect of club membership expenses was deleted by the Ld. CIT(A) in assessee's own case for Assessment Years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2014-15, and he added that Revenue was not in appeal against these orders of the Ld. CIT(A) on the issue of club membership expenses. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee further submitted that no additions are being made by the Assessing Officer in assessee's own case on account of club membership expenses, after AY 2014-15.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 337 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document

Shahzada Nand & Sons vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala on 12 April, 1977

• S.A. Builders Ltd. vs CIT [2007] 288 ITR 1 (SC) • Sasoon J. David & Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs CIT [1979] 118 ITR 261 (SC) • Shahzada Nand & Sons vs CIT 108 ITR 358 (SC) • CIT vs Chandulal Keshavlal & Co. [1960] 38 ITR 601 (SC) (C.1.1) Ld. Counsel for the assessee also submitted that the disallowances in respect of club membership expenses was deleted by the Ld. CIT(A) in assessee's own case for Assessment Years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2014-15, and he added that Revenue was not in appeal against these orders of the Ld. CIT(A) on the issue of club membership expenses. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee further submitted that no additions are being made by the Assessing Officer in assessee's own case on account of club membership expenses, after AY 2014-15.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 114 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay vs Chandulal Keshavlal & Co., Petlad on 17 February, 1960

• S.A. Builders Ltd. vs CIT [2007] 288 ITR 1 (SC) • Sasoon J. David & Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs CIT [1979] 118 ITR 261 (SC) • Shahzada Nand & Sons vs CIT 108 ITR 358 (SC) • CIT vs Chandulal Keshavlal & Co. [1960] 38 ITR 601 (SC) (C.1.1) Ld. Counsel for the assessee also submitted that the disallowances in respect of club membership expenses was deleted by the Ld. CIT(A) in assessee's own case for Assessment Years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2014-15, and he added that Revenue was not in appeal against these orders of the Ld. CIT(A) on the issue of club membership expenses. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee further submitted that no additions are being made by the Assessing Officer in assessee's own case on account of club membership expenses, after AY 2014-15.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 273 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document

Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs J.K. Synthetics Ltd. on 21 February, 2001

• CIT vs J.K. Synthetics Limited [2009] 309 ITR 371 (Delhi) • CIT vs Sharda Motor Industrial Ltd. [2009] 319 ITR 109 (Delhi) • Climate Systems India Ltd. vs CIT [2009] 319 ITR 113 (Delhi) • J.J. Enterprises vs CIT: [2002] 254 ITR 216 (SC) • Roger Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. vs IAC: [1995] 52 TTJ 198 (Del) • CIT vs Aero Club: [2011] 336 ITR 400 (Del) Page 9 of 15 ITA No.8285 & 8286/Del/2019 DCIT vs. Federal Mogul Goetze (India) Ltd.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 176 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Motor Industries Company ... on 2 July, 2015

• CIT vs J.K. Synthetics Limited [2009] 309 ITR 371 (Delhi) • CIT vs Sharda Motor Industrial Ltd. [2009] 319 ITR 109 (Delhi) • Climate Systems India Ltd. vs CIT [2009] 319 ITR 113 (Delhi) • J.J. Enterprises vs CIT: [2002] 254 ITR 216 (SC) • Roger Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. vs IAC: [1995] 52 TTJ 198 (Del) • CIT vs Aero Club: [2011] 336 ITR 400 (Del) Page 9 of 15 ITA No.8285 & 8286/Del/2019 DCIT vs. Federal Mogul Goetze (India) Ltd.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 58 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next