Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.32 seconds)

Management Of Krishnakali Tea Estate vs Akhil Bharatiya Chah Mazdoor Sangh & Anr on 10 September, 2004

Recently, in Employers, Management, Muriadih Colliery M/s BCCL Ltd. v. Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union, Through Workmen (JT 2005 (2) SC 444) this Court after referring to and quoting the relevant passages from Management of Krishnakali Tea Estate v. Akhil Bharatiya Chah Mazdoor Sangh & Anr. [2004 (7) SCALE 608] and The Management of Tournamulla Estate Vs. Workmen, [(1973) 2 SCC 502] held :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 163 - Full Document

Employers,Mgmt., M. Colliery M/S Bccl ... vs Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union Through: ... on 22 February, 2005

Recently, in Employers, Management, Muriadih Colliery M/s BCCL Ltd. v. Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union, Through Workmen (JT 2005 (2) SC 444) this Court after referring to and quoting the relevant passages from Management of Krishnakali Tea Estate v. Akhil Bharatiya Chah Mazdoor Sangh & Anr. [2004 (7) SCALE 608] and The Management of Tournamulla Estate Vs. Workmen, [(1973) 2 SCC 502] held :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 38 - Full Document

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation vs Subhash Chandra Sharma & Ors on 15 March, 2000

In U.P. State Road Transport Corpn. Vs. Subhash Chandra Sharma and others , (2000) 3 SCC 324, this Court, after referring to the scope of interference with punishment under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, held that the Labour Court was not justified in interfering with the order of removal from service when the charge against the employee stood proved. It was also held that the jurisdiction vested with the Labour Court to interfere with punishment was not to be exercised capriciously and arbitrarily. It was necessary, in a case where the Labour Court finds the charge proved, for a conclusion to be arrived that the punishment was shockingly disproportionate to the nature of the charge found proved, before it could interfere to reduce the punishment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 128 - S S Ahmad - Full Document

Management Of Tournamulla Estate vs Workmen on 26 March, 1973

Recently, in Employers, Management, Muriadih Colliery M/s BCCL Ltd. v. Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union, Through Workmen (JT 2005 (2) SC 444) this Court after referring to and quoting the relevant passages from Management of Krishnakali Tea Estate v. Akhil Bharatiya Chah Mazdoor Sangh & Anr. [2004 (7) SCALE 608] and The Management of Tournamulla Estate Vs. Workmen, [(1973) 2 SCC 502] held :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 51 - A N Grover - Full Document
1   2 Next