Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.49 seconds)

Kuljit Singh Behal vs Daman Chopra Through His Lr Sanjeev ... on 17 May, 2019

Moreover, as has also been brought to the notice of this Court that vide the above mentioned orders dated 17.05.2019 passed by this Court in Kuljit Singh Behal Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Avtar Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and SUNENA 2022.12.16 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 6 another (supra); Naresh Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Harish Makkar Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Raj Kumar Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); and Ajaib Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra), all other six tenants have been evicted from the plot No. 108, and have even handed over possession to the respondents after Civil Revisions filed by these other tenants were dismissed by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court. It is also clear that except for the petitioner there is no other tenant on the plot No. 108 at the moment as the said rag picker was merely a caretaker of the building. Nothing has been placed on record or brought to the notice of this Court by ld. Counsel for the petitioner to prove otherwise.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - L Gill - Full Document

Avtar Singh vs Daman Chopra Through His Lr Sanjeev ... on 17 May, 2019

Moreover, as has also been brought to the notice of this Court that vide the above mentioned orders dated 17.05.2019 passed by this Court in Kuljit Singh Behal Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Avtar Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and SUNENA 2022.12.16 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 6 another (supra); Naresh Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Harish Makkar Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Raj Kumar Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); and Ajaib Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra), all other six tenants have been evicted from the plot No. 108, and have even handed over possession to the respondents after Civil Revisions filed by these other tenants were dismissed by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court. It is also clear that except for the petitioner there is no other tenant on the plot No. 108 at the moment as the said rag picker was merely a caretaker of the building. Nothing has been placed on record or brought to the notice of this Court by ld. Counsel for the petitioner to prove otherwise.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - L Gill - Full Document

Naresh Singh vs Daman Chopra Through Her Lr Sanjeev ... on 17 May, 2019

Moreover, as has also been brought to the notice of this Court that vide the above mentioned orders dated 17.05.2019 passed by this Court in Kuljit Singh Behal Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Avtar Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and SUNENA 2022.12.16 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 6 another (supra); Naresh Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Harish Makkar Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Raj Kumar Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); and Ajaib Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra), all other six tenants have been evicted from the plot No. 108, and have even handed over possession to the respondents after Civil Revisions filed by these other tenants were dismissed by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court. It is also clear that except for the petitioner there is no other tenant on the plot No. 108 at the moment as the said rag picker was merely a caretaker of the building. Nothing has been placed on record or brought to the notice of this Court by ld. Counsel for the petitioner to prove otherwise.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - L Gill - Full Document

Harish Makkar vs Daman Chopra(Deceased) Through His Lr ... on 17 May, 2019

Moreover, as has also been brought to the notice of this Court that vide the above mentioned orders dated 17.05.2019 passed by this Court in Kuljit Singh Behal Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Avtar Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and SUNENA 2022.12.16 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 6 another (supra); Naresh Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Harish Makkar Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Raj Kumar Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); and Ajaib Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra), all other six tenants have been evicted from the plot No. 108, and have even handed over possession to the respondents after Civil Revisions filed by these other tenants were dismissed by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court. It is also clear that except for the petitioner there is no other tenant on the plot No. 108 at the moment as the said rag picker was merely a caretaker of the building. Nothing has been placed on record or brought to the notice of this Court by ld. Counsel for the petitioner to prove otherwise.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - L Gill - Full Document

Raj Kumar vs Daman Chopra Through Lrs on 17 May, 2019

Moreover, as has also been brought to the notice of this Court that vide the above mentioned orders dated 17.05.2019 passed by this Court in Kuljit Singh Behal Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Avtar Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and SUNENA 2022.12.16 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 6 another (supra); Naresh Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Harish Makkar Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Raj Kumar Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); and Ajaib Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra), all other six tenants have been evicted from the plot No. 108, and have even handed over possession to the respondents after Civil Revisions filed by these other tenants were dismissed by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court. It is also clear that except for the petitioner there is no other tenant on the plot No. 108 at the moment as the said rag picker was merely a caretaker of the building. Nothing has been placed on record or brought to the notice of this Court by ld. Counsel for the petitioner to prove otherwise.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - L Gill - Full Document

Ajaib Singh vs Daman Chopra Since Deceased Through Lrs ... on 22 May, 2019

Moreover, as has also been brought to the notice of this Court that vide the above mentioned orders dated 17.05.2019 passed by this Court in Kuljit Singh Behal Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Avtar Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and SUNENA 2022.12.16 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 6 another (supra); Naresh Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Harish Makkar Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); Raj Kumar Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra); and Ajaib Singh Vs. Daman Chopra (deceased) through LR and another (supra), all other six tenants have been evicted from the plot No. 108, and have even handed over possession to the respondents after Civil Revisions filed by these other tenants were dismissed by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court. It is also clear that except for the petitioner there is no other tenant on the plot No. 108 at the moment as the said rag picker was merely a caretaker of the building. Nothing has been placed on record or brought to the notice of this Court by ld. Counsel for the petitioner to prove otherwise.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - L Gill - Full Document

Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. vs Dilbahar Singh on 27 August, 2014

Even otherwise, as per the aforementioned decisions rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Dilbahar Singh (supra) and Shalini Shyam Shetty and another Vs. Rajendra Shankar Patil (supra), it is not open to this Court to interfere in the cases of property rights and in disputes between private individuals unless there is infraction of statute or it can be shown that a private individual is acting in collusion with the Statutory Authority. That is not so in the present case.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 47 - Cited by 510 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Shalini Shyam Shetty & Anr vs Rajendra Shankar Patil on 23 July, 2010

Even otherwise, as per the aforementioned decisions rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Dilbahar Singh (supra) and Shalini Shyam Shetty and another Vs. Rajendra Shankar Patil (supra), it is not open to this Court to interfere in the cases of property rights and in disputes between private individuals unless there is infraction of statute or it can be shown that a private individual is acting in collusion with the Statutory Authority. That is not so in the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 2466 - Full Document
1