Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.15 seconds)
Anandbhai Mansangbhai Chaudhury vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited on 11 February, 2020 cites

M/S Galada Power & Telecomun.Ltd. vs United India Insurnce Co.Ltd. on 28 July, 2016

15.   On the basis of the above decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court M/s Galada Power and (Supra) it is clear that the issue of recovery of the vehicle having the same chassis number and engine number but with different number plate should not have been raised by the insurance company and the State Commission should not have considered the same.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 11 - Cited by 72 - D Misra - Full Document

Krishna Wanti Puri vs The Life Insurance Corporation Of ... on 3 December, 1973

In this regard, Mr. Mukherjee, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant has commended us to a decision of High Court of Delhi in Krishna Wanti v. Life Insurance Corporation of India[1], wherein the High Court has taken note of the fact that if the letter of repudiation did not mention an aspect, the same could not be taken as a stand when the matter is decided. We approve the said view."
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 25 - Full Document

Amalendu Sahu vs Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd on 25 March, 2010

17.   I also agree with the assertion of the learned counsel for the insurance company that non-submission of information of earlier two claims from the other insurance company has caused the insurance company to take a higher IDV of the vehicle. Thus, clearly, the two important conditions of the policy have been violated in the present case. In the circumstances, the circular issued by the Insurance Regulator Development Authority (IRDA) no. IRDA/HLTH/MISC/CIR/216/09/2011 dated 20.09.2011, has instructed to all its general insurance companies to consider the genuine claims filed even with delay and should not be rejected only on the ground of delay. Keeping this in mind and keeping this fact that the important conditions have been violated, I deem it appropriate to allow 50% of insurance claim on the basis of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Amalendu Sahoo vs Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., - II (2010) CPJ 9 (SC), wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down that the insurance claim upto 75% can be admitted if some condition of the insurance policy has been violated. In the present case, the theft has been proved in the police report and the insurance company has also not disputed the theft of the vehicle either in the repudiation letter or in the written statement.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 350 - Full Document
1