Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 43 (0.33 seconds)Section 18 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Article 31 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 80 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 30 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 115 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 39 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Specific Relief Act, 1963
Tinsukhia Electric Supply Co. Ltd vs State Of Assam And Ors on 13 April, 1989
We may also note that the Supreme Court has in Tinsukhia Electric Supply Co. Ltd. V. State of Assam , observed that even though Article 31 had not been deleted (at the time of the 42nd Amendment) (at p.138). 'Its content had been cut down so much, so that even under a law providing for acquisition of property which did not have the protection of 31-C the adequacy of the "Amount" determined was not justiciable and all that was necessary was that it should not be unreal or illusory. By then the Constitution had done away with the idea of a just equivalent or full indemnification principle and substituted therefore the idea of an 'Amount' and rendered the question of the adequacy or the inadequacy of the amount non-justiciable'. Even the attenuated operation of Article 31(2) referred to above was done away with by the 44th Amendment by deleting it altogether from the Constitution".