Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.31 seconds)

Deepak Sahu And Ors vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. 17 ... on 29 April, 2019

"15 Unfortunately, the High Court did not discuss the materials on record in detail. It is not in dispute that the deceased was an indoor patient from 1401.1991 to 21.1.1991. fie thereafter was being treated in Government Hospital, Palladama. He died there. The medical certificate shows that the cause of death was due to the primary disease hypoxic encephalopathy and immediate cause of death was due to cardiorespiratory arrest. The doctor examined on behalf of the claimants categorically stated that the accident might have been the cause of death of the deceased. The doctor examined on behalf the behalf of the deceased. The respondent did not bring any material on record to show that there was no link between the accident and the death. The finding of the High Court that there was no proper medical treatment and, therefore, cause of death is Deepak Sah Vs. Sanjeev Kumar & Ors. 13/33 MACP No. 7106/16; FIR No. 416/16; PS. Alipur DOD: 19.10.2022 not attributable to the accident does not appear to be based on any material on record. In any event, it cannot be said to be the correct approach adopted by the High Court particularly when the Tribunal on the basis of the materials brought on record by the parties came to a contrary finding. No strong and cogent reason has been assigned by the High Court in support of its judgment reversing the findings of the Tribunal. It accepted the submission made on behalf of the respondent herein without analysing the materials and without arriving at a clear finding of fact."
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - S Agrawal - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi And Others on 22 June, 2022

In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case and in view of decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of "National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors." mentioned supra, a sum of Rs.15,000/­+Rs.1,500/­ (enhancement @ 10% of Rs.15,000/­)=Rs.16,500/­ each is awarded in favour of petitioners on account of loss of estate and funeral expenses.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1946 - J R Dua - Full Document

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ... vs Pooja & Ors. on 2 November, 2017

Further Hon'ble Delhi High Court in appeal titled as "Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pooja & Ors", mentioned supra has been pleased to observe in para 18 of the judgment that the constitution bench decision in Pranay Sethi (supra) does not recognize any other non­pecuniary head of damages. Hence, no amount of compensation is being awarded under this head.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 412 - R K Gauba - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Meenakshi Gupta & Ors. on 19 July, 2019

In the matter titled as "National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Meenakshi Gupta & Ors." (supra), it has been held by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in para no. 2 as under:­ xxxxxxx " It was argued on behalf of insurance company that in the absence of any postmortem report, it cannot be held that the injured died due to the accidental injuries, more so when the death took place after about six months of the accident. This argument is bereft of merit. It is true that there is no postmortem report on record to show that the death took place due to accidental injuries but the widow of the deceased has stated on oath that the said death was due to the accidental injuries. The insurance company was free to bring any evidence on record contrary to this averment but no such evidence was brought on record by the insurance company and hence, the version of widow of the deceased that the death of her husband took place due to accidental injuries cannot be disbelieved, particularly in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, it, is thus, held that the deceased died as a result of injuries sustained by him in the accident."
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 8 - N Waziri - Full Document
1   2 Next