Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.31 seconds)

Chikkarange Gowda And Ors. vs State Of Mysore on 9 May, 1956

The distinction betweens the two parts of Section 149 cannot be ignored or obliterated. In every case is would be an issue to be determined, whether the offence committed falls within the first Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.352 of 2005 dt.16-09-2011 29 part or it was an offence such as the members of the assembly knew to be likely to be committed in prosecution of the common object and falls within the second part. However, there may be cases which would be within first offences committed in prosecution of the common object would be generally, if not always, with the second, namely, offences which the parties knew to be likely committed in the prosecution of the common object. (See Chikkarange Gowda and others v. State of Mysore :
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 87 - S K Das - Full Document
1   2 Next