Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.18 seconds)Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Damodar S.Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H on 3 May, 2010
It has also been held in Damodar S. Prabhu Vs Sayed Babala H. of
Supreme Court of India that if the matter is compromised in the court of Appeal
CA No. 04/13 3/4
before the court of Sessions Court than the same be allowed on the condition that
the accused will pay 15 percent of the cheque amount by way of cost. It has also
been held that scale of cost has been suggested in the interest of uniformity. The
competent court can of course reduce the costs with regard to the specific facts and
circumstances of a case, while recording reasons in writing for such variance.
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
K.M. Ibrahim vs K.P. Mohammed & Anr on 2 December, 2009
It has also been held in K.M.Ibrahim V. K.P. Mohammed and Anr.,
2009 (14) SCALE 262 that " It is true that the application under section 147 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act was made by the parties after the proceedings had been
concluded before the Appellate Forum. However, Section 147 of the aforesaid Act
does not bar the parties from compounding an offence under Section 138 even at
the appellate stage of the proceedings. Accordingly, we find no reason to reject the
application under Section 147 of the aforesaid Act even in a proceeding under
Article 136 of the Constitution."
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
1