Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.23 seconds)
M/S Aai Tuljabhawani Transport vs The Union Of India And Ors on 3 March, 2021 cites

Union Of India (Uoi) vs Rampur Distillery And Chemical Co., ... on 20 February, 1973

In support of his contention, the learned Counsel for the Applicant relies on the judgment of the Apex Court in the matter of Union of India vs. Rampur Distillery & Chemical Co. Ltd. Reported in AIR 1973 SC 1098. He submits that, the Apex Court in this matter held that, if there is no loss to the principal, then there is no question of forfeiting the security amount.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 74 - Full Document

Central Coalfieds Limited vs Sll-Sml (Joint Venture Consortium) . on 17 August, 2016

"11. Recently, in Central Coalfelds Ltd. v. SLL- SML (Joint Venture Consortium) : 2016(8) SCALE Mohite 19/23 ia3797-20.odt 99 it was held by this Court, relying on a host of decisions that the decision making process of the employer or owner of the project in accepting or rejecting the bid of a tenderer should not be interfered with. Interference is permissible only if the decision making process is mala fde or is intended to favour someone. Similarly, the decision should not be interfered with unless the decision is so arbitrary or irrational that the Court could say that the decision is one which no responsible authority acting reasonably and in accordance with law could have reached. In other words, the decision making process or the decision should be perverse and not merely faulty or incorrect or erroneous.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 9 - Cited by 360 - M B Lokur - Full Document

Tata Cellular vs Union Of India on 26 July, 1994

Tata Cellular v. Union of India : (1994) 6 SCC 651 went a step further and held that a decision if challenged (the decision having been arrived at through a valid process), the constitutional Courts can interfere if the decision is perverse. However, the constitutional Courts are expected to exercise restraint in interfering with the administrative decision and ought not to substitute its view for that of the administrative authority.
Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 3275 - S Mohan - Full Document
1