Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.41 seconds)Jagdish Pershad And Ors. vs Joti Pershad And Ors. on 16 December, 1974
In suit for partition, valuation for the purpose
of jurisdiction is value of the whole property sought in the partition
as held in Jagdish Pershad Vs. Joti Pershad 1975 ILR (Del 841). As
per his plaint in Para No.11, the plaintiff has simply stated that "the
value of the suit for the purposes of jurisdiction is Rs.2 lakhs being
his estimated share in suit properties." Thus, admittedly, the
plaintiff has valued the suit as per his estimated share in the suit
properties and has not considered the value of whole of the
properties sought to be partitioned.
Sh. Mohd. Taj vs Sh. Miraz Ahmed & Another on 27 April, 2011
The plaintiff has placed on record as
Ex.PW1/1 Order and statement dt. 17.03.1992 passed in suit
no.501/85 titled as Sh. Mohd. Arif Vs. Sh. Swail Ahmed in the Ld.
Court of Sh. D.C. Anand, Sub-Judge, Delhi. However, perusal of
Ex.PW1/1 does not in any manner, show the extent of rights that
were being claimed by the parties. It also does not show whether the
compromise entered into between the parties, was with respect to
the immovable properties as contained in the plaint.
1