Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.34 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Essential Commodities Act, 1955
Smt. B. Manjula vs District Collector, Civil Supplies, ... on 26 November, 2014
(iv) In B.Manjula v. District Collector, Civil Supplies4, this Court
held at paragraph No.4 that Sub clause (5) of clause 5 of the Control
Order, 2008 enjoins on the appointing authority to follow two mandatory
conditions before imposing any penalty as envisaged therein. The first, it
shall make an 'enquiry' as deemed necessary; and the second, it shall
record reasons in writing.
P. Hanumantha Rao vs The Chief Rationing Officer And Anr. on 11 August, 1993
(i) In P.Hanumantha Rao v Chief Rationing Officer1, this Court
held at paragraph No.4 as follows:
Section 3 in The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
M. Sadasiva Sekhar vs District Collector And Ors. on 7 March, 2003
(iii) In M.Sadasiva Sekhar v. District Collector, Kurnool3, this
Court held at paragraph No.25 that, "25. In every case where the
authorization is cancelled after affording an opportunity of making a
representation / filing explanation, even if oral hearing is not held, the
dealer has to plead and prove the prejudice caused to him. ... ... "
M. Shashikala vs The Collector, Civil Supplies And Anr. on 28 January, 1997
(ii) In M.Shashikala v The Collector, Civil Supplies2, a Division
Bench of this Court held at paragraph No.11, as follows:
1