Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.28 seconds)
Umesh Balchand Manvatkar And 2 Ors. vs State Of Mah.Thr.P.S.O.Gondia(City) on 15 October, 2025
cites
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 148 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 134 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 149 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Nagesar vs State Of Chhatisgarh on 5 May, 2014
He further placed reliance on the decision in
the case of Nagesar vs. State of Chhattisgarh supra
wherein it is held that mere presence or association with
other members alone does not per se be sufficient to hold
everyone of them criminally liable for the offences
committed by the others unless there was sufficient
evidence on record to show that one such also intended to
or knew the likelihood of commission of such an
offending act.
Narendrasinh Keshubhai Zala vs State Of Gujarat on 16 March, 2023
In support of his contentions, he placed
reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the
case of Narendrasinh Keshubhai Zala vs. State of Gujarat,
reported in 2023 STPL 3403 SC.
Baddi Venkata Narasayya & Ors vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 24 November, 1997
Judgment
487 apeals715 and 747.04
47
Narasayya and ors supra wherein it has been observed
that where a criminal court has to deal with evidence
pertaining to the commission of an offence involving a
large number of offenders and a large number of victims,
it is usual to adopt the test that the conviction could be
sustained only if it is supported by two or three or more
witnesses who give a consistent account of the incident.