Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 43 (0.30 seconds)Section 223 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 218 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 223 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 219 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 304B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 220 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Maharashtra vs Salman Salim Khan & Anr on 18 December, 2003
15. On
perusal of Section 218 of the Code, it becomes clear that for every
distinct offence of which any person is accused, there shall be a
separate charge and every such charge shall be tried separately.
Thereafter, a proviso is added to sub-section (1) which says
that where the accused person, by an application in writing, so
desires and the Magistrate is of the opinion that such person is not
likely to be prejudiced thereby the Magistrate may try together all
or any number of the charges framed against such person. While
sub-section (2) makes it abundantly clear that nothing in sub-section
(1) shall affect the operation of the provisions of Sections 219,
220, 221 and 223. Considering the facts of the present case, it is
true that the incidents in question took place on 11-09-2007,
28-09-2007, 01-01-2008, 11-01-2008 and 25-01-2008. The incidents
either took place in the PTC College or Village Kimbuva and all the
accused were not involved in the alleged offences on the dates
mentioned herein. Considering the aforesaid period, different
persons committed the heinous crime on the victim. The charge has
been framed by the learned Judge on the basis of the material which
was placed on the record of the case by the prosecution and when the
Court found that the material which was placed before it was prima
facie sufficient to frame the charge against all the petitioners,
the charge was framed against all the petitioners. However, in view
of the judgments rendered by the Apex Court in the case of State
of Maharashtra Vs. Salman Salim Khan (supra), the
truthfulness, the sufficiency and acceptability of the material
produced at the time of framing of the charge can be done only at the
stage of trial. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of
the case, joint charge came to be framed against all the accused.