Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (1.62 seconds)Section 134 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Section 29 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Pidilite Industries Limited vs Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products ... on 13 January, 2014
In support of his contention, he placed reliance upon the decisions in
Pidilite Industries Ltd v. Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Ltd. 1, Jagdish Gopal
Kamath and Others v. Lime and Chilli Hospitality Services 2 and Prince Pipes and
Fittings Ltd. v. Shree Sai Plast Pvt. Ltd. 3
1 2014 SCC OnLine Bom 50
2 2015 SCC OnLine Bom 531
3 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 3743
Vaibhav 5
::: Uploaded on - 23/01/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 23/01/2026 23:12:53 :::
902-IA(L)-35022-2024
Jagdish Gopal Kamath And Others vs Lime & Chilli Hospitality Services P. ... on 22 April, 2013
In support of his contention, he placed reliance upon the decisions in
Pidilite Industries Ltd v. Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Ltd. 1, Jagdish Gopal
Kamath and Others v. Lime and Chilli Hospitality Services 2 and Prince Pipes and
Fittings Ltd. v. Shree Sai Plast Pvt. Ltd. 3
1 2014 SCC OnLine Bom 50
2 2015 SCC OnLine Bom 531
3 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 3743
Vaibhav 5
::: Uploaded on - 23/01/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 23/01/2026 23:12:53 :::
902-IA(L)-35022-2024
Hindustan Embroidery Mills Pvt. Ltd. vs K. Ravindra And Co. on 11 October, 1967
In support of his contention, he placed reliance upon the decisions in
Hindustan Embroidery Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. K. Ravindra & Co. 4 and Himalaya Drug Co.
v. SBL Limited5.
Himalaya Drug Co. vs Sbl Limited on 3 June, 2010
In support of his contention, he placed reliance upon the decisions in
Hindustan Embroidery Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. K. Ravindra & Co. 4 and Himalaya Drug Co.
v. SBL Limited5.
Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd vs Sanjay Dalia & Anr on 1 July, 2015
28. Dr. Tulzapurkar then placed reliance upon the judgment of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Indian Performing Rights Society Limited v. Sanjay Dalia and
Another6, to submit that the Supreme Court had categorically held that Section
134(2) must be construed in a manner that prevents the mischief of a Plaintiff
dragging a Defendant to a forum which has no real or substantial connection with
the dispute, particularly where the cause of action has arisen elsewhere or where the
Defendant does not carry on business.
Manugraph India Ltd vs Sigmarq Technologies Pvt. Ltd. And 9 Ors on 15 June, 2016
He further pointed out that the judgment of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Indian Performing Rights Society Limited had been
consistently followed, including in the decision of Manugraph India Limited v.
Simarq Technologies Pvt. Ltd.7
6 (2015) 10 SCC 161
7 2016 SCC Online Bom 5334
Vaibhav 12
::: Uploaded on - 23/01/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 23/01/2026 23:12:53 :::
902-IA(L)-35022-2024
M/S. Dhodha House vs S.K. Maingi on 15 December, 2005
In support of this
contention, he placed reliance upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Dhodha House v. S.K. Maingi.8