Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 27 (0.31 seconds)

Union Of India vs Shankar Lal Soni & Anr on 8 December, 2009

22. On a plain and simple reading of the said provision, there could be no doubt in anybody's mind that the convicts in the normal course should have only been awarded up to maximum period of sentence unless there were found special and adequate reasons for lessor sentence. Section 135 (3) of the Act then provided that mere fact that accused was first time offender or that his goods has been confiscated or penalty has been imposed besides the fact that he was not a principal Union of India v. Shankar Lal Aggarwal & Ors. 13/ 22 14 offender as or his age, shall not be such factors on which sentence could be awarded for a period of less than one year.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 16 - H S Bedi - Full Document

Supdt., Narcotic Control Bureau vs Parash Singh on 15 October, 2008

Vide separate order of even date, I do not see that the ld ACMM has committed any patent error, illegality or impropriety in passing the impugned order inter alia extending the legislative benevolence to the respondents/convicts. At the cost of repetition, the Union of India v. Shankar Lal Aggarwal & Ors. 23/ 22 24 reliance on the proposition of law laid down in Parash Singh (supra) by the ld ACMM, New Delhi can not be faulted and the ratio in the cited case is squarely applicable to the facts and circumstances of the instant case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 21 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 3 Next