Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.20 seconds)Jugal Kishore vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 20 January, 1973
In a later decision in Jugat Kishore v. State of Rajasthan, 1973 WLN 52 : (AIR 1973 Raj 244), in which the validity of Section" 15-A was again questioned, it was held to be valid.
Baru Mal Jain And Ors. vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors. on 22 March, 1961
In Baru Mal Jain v. State of U. P., AIR 1962 All 61, it was held that once the award is prepared and filed in the Collector's office, it becomes final and then it cannot be changed.
Usman Gani vs S.T.A.T. [Along With D.B. Civil Special ... on 16 February, 1981
Gani Mohammed v. S, T. A. T., 1976 Raj LW 201 : (AIR 1977 (NOC) 183) and G. Venkateswara Rao v. Govt. of A. P., AIR 1966 SC 828 were referred to. In the latter decision, the Supreme Court came to the conclusion that the State Govt. had no power under Section 72 of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads Act to review its previous order, yet their Lordships refused to interfere with the order passed by the State Government, upon such a review on the ground that quashing of that order would lead to restoration of an illegal order passed earlier by the State Government. In the case on hand, the learned single Judge was right when he held that the extraordinary powers of this Court cannot be availed of for restoring a wrong order even when the order was set aside by the authority not competent. The petitioner is not entitled to the relief of restoration of the order (Ex. 3) dt. June 24, 1967 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer on review. The learned single Judge had also set aside the order dt. April 17, 1967 by which it was held that the petitioner was not competent to any compensation and remanded the case to the Land Acquisition Officer to examine the petitioner's case solely on the point of compensation under the relevant provisions of the Act.
1