Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.85 seconds)Arjun Chaubey vs Union Of India And Others on 23 March, 1984
The case of Arjun Chaubey vs. Union of India is an instance in point."
Anil Kumar Yadav Son Of Sri Rama Yadav vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ... on 27 August, 2007
6. This aspect has also been considered by this court in catena of decisions where it has been held that the disciplinary authorities are completely ignoring and failing to consider the matter in correct perspective and regularly passing orders which are not in conformity with the requirement of law where an action could have been taken against an employee without holding any department enquiry (See: Raja Ram Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 657; Jahir Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 605; Subhas Chandra Yadav Vs. State of U.P., 2009 All L.J. (3) 414; Satya Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and others (Civil Misc.
Jawahir Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 2 Ors on 25 September, 2019
6. This aspect has also been considered by this court in catena of decisions where it has been held that the disciplinary authorities are completely ignoring and failing to consider the matter in correct perspective and regularly passing orders which are not in conformity with the requirement of law where an action could have been taken against an employee without holding any department enquiry (See: Raja Ram Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 657; Jahir Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 605; Subhas Chandra Yadav Vs. State of U.P., 2009 All L.J. (3) 414; Satya Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and others (Civil Misc.
Subhash Chandra Yadav vs The State Of U.P. And Others on 13 April, 2018
6. This aspect has also been considered by this court in catena of decisions where it has been held that the disciplinary authorities are completely ignoring and failing to consider the matter in correct perspective and regularly passing orders which are not in conformity with the requirement of law where an action could have been taken against an employee without holding any department enquiry (See: Raja Ram Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 657; Jahir Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 605; Subhas Chandra Yadav Vs. State of U.P., 2009 All L.J. (3) 414; Satya Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and others (Civil Misc.
Yadunath Singh @ Sonu Singh vs State Of U.P. on 1 November, 2022
5. This question has been repeatedly considered by this Court and a Division Bench of this Court in Yadunath Singh Vs. State of U.P. & Others 2009 (9) ADJ 86, in a similar matter, has observed in paras 4 to 7 as under:
Ram Sanehi Misra vs State Of U.P. And Others on 4 March, 2020
Writ Petition No. 28875 of 2006), decided on 07.11.2008; Ram Sanehi Misra Vs. State of U.P. and others (Civil Misc.
Ravi Dutt Tyagi vs State Of U.P. And Another on 28 May, 2021
Writ Petition No. 61271 of 2006), decided on 05.10.2009; and, Ravi Dutt Tyagi Vs. State of U.P. and others (Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 56979 of 2006), decided on 17.02.2009).
Jaswant Singh Nerwal Etc vs State Of Punjab And Ors. Etc on 14 February, 1991
7. The words "reasons to be recorded in writing that it is not reasonably practicable to hold enquiry" means that there must be some material for satisfaction of the disciplinary authority that it is not reasonably practicable. The decision to dispense with the departmental enquiry cannot be rested solely on the ipse dixit of the concerned authority. Apex Court in the case of Jaswant Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others AIR 1991 SC 385 has observed:
Satya Prakash vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 14 March, 2000
6. This aspect has also been considered by this court in catena of decisions where it has been held that the disciplinary authorities are completely ignoring and failing to consider the matter in correct perspective and regularly passing orders which are not in conformity with the requirement of law where an action could have been taken against an employee without holding any department enquiry (See: Raja Ram Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 657; Jahir Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2009(6) ADJ 605; Subhas Chandra Yadav Vs. State of U.P., 2009 All L.J. (3) 414; Satya Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and others (Civil Misc.
1