Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.20 seconds)
Bhawani Prasad Sahu And 8 Ors. vs State Of U.P. Through Secy. Finance ... on 14 December, 2022 cites

Randhir Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 22 February, 1982

In support of his contention, he has placed reliance upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Randhir Singh vs. Union of India and others reported in (1982) 1 SCC 618, where Apex Court has held that if two departments are under control of one Government and employees are having similar duty, no discrimination can be made in their salary and both sets of employees would be governed by principal of 'equal pay for equal work' and entitled for same salary.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 521 - O C Reddy - Full Document

Secretary, Finance Department And Ors vs West Bengal Registration Service ... on 20 February, 1992

In light of facts mentioned hereinabove as well as law laid down by Apex Court, this Court is of the view that once the employer is same, mode of recruitment, qualification for the post, nature of work and other responsibilities are same, such employees shall be governed by principal of 'equal pay for equal work', and there cannot be any denial of similar pay scale on any ground.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 181 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document

State Of U.P. vs Randheer Singh on 27 January, 2020

I have considered the rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. I have also gone through the judgments relied upon by the leaned counsel for the parties. Facts of the case are undisputed. Irrigation Department and PWD are the department of State of U.P., having equal status headed by the Principal Secretary appointed by the State Government. Petitioners as well as generator operator of Irrigation Department are performing same duty of running the generator of over and above of 50 KVA. There is also no difference in appointment procedure and nature of work of petitioners and generator operators of Irrigation Department. Similar matter came before the Apex Court in the case of State of U.P. vs. Randheer Singh (supra) and Apex Court has taken clear cut view that if two departments are under control of one Government and employees are having similar duty, no discrimination can be made in their salary and both sets of employees would be governed by principal of 'equal pay for equal work.' Relevant paragraph nos. 8 & 9 of the said judgment are quoted hereinbelow:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - C D Singh - Full Document

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Sushma Ptal on 4 August, 2021

Respondents have also relied upon the judgment of Apex Court in the matter of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Sushma Sharma (supra). Apex Court held that while considering the case of 'equal pay for equal work', mode of recruitment, qualification for the post, nature of work, value of work & responsibilities involved and various other factors has to be taken into consideration and Court can only interfere where there is discrimination between two sets of employees appointed by the State Government. Here, there is no dispute that both the department are having equal status, mode of recruitment, qualification for the post, nature of work, value of work and responsibilities etc., are also same, therefore, Court has full authority to interfere in the matter. In fact, this judgment is in favour of petitioner. Relevant paragraph nos.18 & 23 of the same are quoted hereinbelow:
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - M Rafiq - Full Document
1