Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.23 seconds)R. P. Kapur vs The State Of Punjab on 25 March, 1960
Moreover, all the submissions made at the bar relates to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 CrPC. At this stage, only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1960 SC 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cri.)
State Of Bihar Etc. Etc vs P.P. Sharma, Ias And Anr on 2 April, 1991
426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cri.)
State Of U.P. vs Julfikar & Chunna & Others on 12 January, 2010
This application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the impugned order dated 04.01.2020 as well as entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.39 of 2020 (State Vs. Julfikar), under Sections 4/21 of Mines and Minerals Act, Police Station Singhawali Aheer, District Baghpat
As per the allegations made in the complaint, it is alleged that the applicant had been found to be involved in illegal mining of soil and he is also the owner of JCB Machine, in question.
Amrawati Devi And Another vs State Of U.P. Thru Collector Sultanpur ... on 16 July, 2019
However, it is directed that if the applicant appears/surrenders before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of settled law laid down by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC).
Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P.& Ors on 23 March, 2009
However, it is directed that if the applicant appears/surrenders before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of settled law laid down by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC).
M/S Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd.& ... vs Md Sharaful Haque & Anr on 1 November, 2004
192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another, (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cri.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage.
1