Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.35 seconds)Section 13 in The Assam Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Assam Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
Section 49 in The Assam Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Assam Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in The Assam Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Assam Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
Agricultural Market Committee vs Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd on 7 May, 1997
In the light of the principle culled out and enunciated in the decisions, above referred more particularly Ram Chandra Kailash Kumar's case (supra) and Shalimar's case (supra), we found force on the submission made by Mr. Misra as well as Mr. Sahewalla, learned Sr. counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/Writ petitioner's firm and accordingly, we are inclined to subscribe to the said submissions of the learned counsel of the appellants/ Writ petitioners. On the other hand, the submission made by Mr. P.G. Baruah, learned Advocate General for the State of Assam as well as Mr. S.A. Laskar, learned counsel appearing for the Board do not convince us a wee bit and as such we safely agree to defer with their submissions for the reasons below.
Mam Chand Roller Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd. vs Chief Administrator, Haryana State ... on 28 March, 2000
In the backdrop of those provisions of law vis-a-vis the factual position abovementioned, Mr. D.K. Misra, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mrs. Hazarika, the learned counsel, leading the arguments on behalf of all the Writ petitioners/appellants, states that the judgment and order dated 29.9.1999 passed in CR No. 1459/ 98 (Assam Roller Flour Mills Association v. Assam Agricultural Marketing Board & Others) by the learned Single Judge of this Court is under challenge is all these Writ appeals preferred either by appellants firm or State of Assam as well as the Board. In the said decision, the learned Single Judge held that collection of cess from the member of the association is in violation of section 21 of the Act and Rule 21 (7) of the Rules and the legal fiction provided for in Rule 21(7) are not within the competence of the State of Assam to whom power to frame rules was delegated by the Legislature for which Rule 21(7) was declared as ultra-vires.
Ram Chandra Kailash Kumar And Company ... vs State Of U.P. And Anr. on 25 March, 1980
20. The learned Sr. counsel has also referred t the decision in Ram Chandra Kailash Kumar & Co. v. State of U.P., 1980 (Suppl) SCC-27 and drawn our pointed attention to paragraph 29 of the said decision wherein it was held that the market fee is payable in the market area and if no transaction of sale or purchase takes place in the particular market area, no fee can be charged by the Market Committee in that area. If agricultural produce are merely brought in any market area and despatched outside it without any transaction of sale taking place therein then no market fee can be charged.