Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.25 seconds)
Talwinder Singh vs Diwakar Singla on 12 November, 2014 cites

Ashok Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan on 11 September, 1990

"We are of the opinion that the matter would have to be examined in the light of the observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ashok Kumar v. State of Rajasthan, 1991(1) SCC 166, which are that interference in an appeal against acquittal would be called for only if the judgment under appeal were perverse or based on a mis-reading of the evidence and merely because the appellate Court was inclined to take a different view, could not be a reason calling for interference."
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 806 - R M Sahai - Full Document

Mrinal Das & Ors vs State Of Tripura on 5 September, 2011

Similarly, in Mrinal Das & others v. The State of Tripura, 2011 (9) Supreme Court Cases 479, the Supreme Court, after looking into various judgments, has laid down MAHAVIR SINGH parameters, in which interference can be made in a judgment of 2014.11.17 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CRM-A-290-MA of 2014 6 acquittal, by observing as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 854 - P Sathasivam - Full Document
1