Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.58 seconds)

Preeti Gupta & Anr vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 13 August, 2010

31. Further, this Court in Preeti Gupta vs. State of Jharkhand (2010) 7 SCC 667 held that the courts have to be extremely careful and cautious in dealing with these complaints and must take pragmatic realities into consideration while dealing with matrimonial cases. The allegations of harassment by the husband's close relatives who had been living in different cities and never visited or rarely visited the place where the complainant resided would have an entirely different complexion. The allegations of the complainant are required to be scrutinized with great care and circumspection.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 1452 - D Bhandari - Full Document

Geeta Mehrotra & Anr vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 17 October, 2012

10. The Apex Court, in Payal Sharma v. State of Punjab & Another {Cr.A. No. 4773/2024, decided on 26.11.2024} had, relying on the decision in Geeta Mehrotra (supra), Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam & Others v. State of Bihar & Others {(2022) 6 SCC 599}, Bhajan Lal (supra), and Umesh Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Another {(2013) 10 SCC 591}, had quashed the FIR and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 1248 - G S Misra - Full Document
1   2 Next