Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.25 seconds)Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
Present case
also does not fall under Clause (1), (3) and (5) of para No.102 of
the decision in the case of Bhajan Lal(supra). Mr. Borthakur,
learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the respondents, has rightly
pointed out that no plausible reason has been assigned by the
petitioner for quashing the aforementioned proceeding, and there
appears to be substance in the same.
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 145 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Shanti Kumar Panda vs Shakutala Devi on 3 November, 2003
12. Though Mr. Kamar, learned counsel for the petitioner, has
tried his level best to persuade this Court that in view of the
pendency of the title suit before the learned Civil Judge, Jorhat and
the decision of the said title suit is binding upon the criminal court in
view of the decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Shanti Kumar Panda (supra), yet the said submission left this
Court unimpressed, and the ratio laid down by Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the said case would not come into his assistance as the
said case is factually distinguishable from the present case and the
said proposition of law was laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court
while dealing with an application under Section 145 Cr.P.C. Notably,
in a proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C., the courts usually
consider possession of the disputed land by the parties to the
proceeding and the title has always to be adjudicated by Civil Courts
and such circumstances Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the
finding of Civil Court is binding upon the parties. And that being so,
it would not advance the argument of Mr. Kamar.
The Right to Information Act, 2005
Ap Mahesh Cooperative Urban Bank ... vs Ramesh Kumar Bung on 20 July, 2021
8. The law with regard to quashing of an FIR and criminal
proceeding is well settled in a catena of decisions of Hon'ble
Supreme Court, including the decisions in Anukul Singh (supra);
State of Haryana vs. Bhajan Lal, reported in AIR 1992
SC 604; A.P. Mahesh Cooperative Urban Bank Shareholders
Welfare Association vs. Ramesh Kumar Bung and Ors.,
reported in (2021) 9 SCC 152; Pradeep Kumar Kesarwani vs.
State of U.P. & Anr., reported in 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 880;
and Neeharika Infrastructure Private Limited vs. State
of Maharashtra & Ors., reported in (2021) 19 SCC 401.