Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.37 seconds)

Rambaran Prosad vs Ram Mohit Hazra & Ors on 6 September, 1966

A contract of sale does not of itself create any interest in, or charge on, the property. This is expressly declared in Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act. See Rambaran Prosad v. Ram Mohit Hazra [1967]1 SCR 293. The fiduciary character of the personal obligation created by a contract for sale is recognised in Section 3 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and in Section 91 of the Trusts Act. The personal obligation created by a contract of sale is described in Section 40 of the Transfer of Property Act as an obligation arising out of contract and annexed to the ownership of property, but not amounting to an interest or easement therein." In India, the word 'transfer' is defined with reference to the word 'convey'. The word 'conveys' in section 5 of Transfer of Property Act is used in the wider sense of conveying ownership... ...that only on execution of conveyance ownership passes from one party to another...."
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 136 - V Ramaswami - Full Document

Anathula Sudhakar vs P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) By Lrs & Ors on 25 March, 2008

In the facts and circumstances of the present case, in view of provisions of Section 41 (h) of the Specific Relief Act and in the light of law laid down in Anathula Sudhakar's case (supra), equally efficacious reliefs available to the plaintiff would have been the relief of declaration of ownership with possession of the portion in possession of the defendant but the plaintiff has failed to seek these reliefs. The relief of injunction simplicitor cannot be granted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 2311 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1   2 Next