Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.17 seconds)
Cimsys Research India Pvt. Ltd., , ... vs Ito, Ward - 8(1), Kolkata , Kolkata on 26 February, 2020
cites
Cimsys Research India Pvt Ltd., Kolkata vs Department Of Income Tax on 21 May, 2013
It is trite law
that additions cannot be made, based merely on the statement of a third party,
in the absence of any corroborative material evidence. There must be cogent
and palpable material evidence material evidences on record for any justifiable
action in the matter. I find that the AO has not done justice in the matter in this
respect for which the impugned addition cannot stand the test of appeal. I find
that the appellant has discharged its initial onus by furnishing all the requisite
ITA No.1435/Kol/2018 Assessment Year 2012-13
Cimsys Research India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO-Wd-8(1) Kol. Page 4
details in respect of foreign exchange loss incurred by it. It is not the case of
the AO that the appellant has failed to furnish documentary evidences in
support of the said foreign currency loss. Thus, considering the entire facts and
circumstances of the issue at hand in the backdrop of the various case laws
cited in the submission supra and in the absence of any cogent finding or
corroborative materials brought on record by the AO to substantiate his stand
in subverting the submission of the appellant on the impugned matter at the
assessment stage. I do not find any merit in the action of the AO in making the
impugned disallowance of Rs.43,90,251/- as unexplained loss with regard to
the said transactions. In view of the foregoing, I find that the addition made on
this count is not sustainable at the appellate stage which is now directed to be
deleted. The AO is directed accordingly. "
Section 132 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Income Tax Act, 1961
1