Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.32 seconds)Ladli Prasad Jaiswal vs Karnal Distillery Co., Ltd., & Ors on 17 December, 1962
In the aforesaid case of Ladli Parshad Jaiswal v. The Karnal Distillery Co. Ltd., Kamal (AIR 1963 SC 1279) (supra) the Supreme Court has held that in all cases in which the party pleading relies on undue influence the particulars of such undue influence should be stated in the pleading and a vague or general plea can never serve the purpose. Thus, the party pleading must, therefore, be required to plead the precise nature of influence exercised.
Shashi Kumar Banerjee & Ors vs Subodh Kumar Banerjee Since Deceased & ... on 13 September, 1963
In Shashi Kumar Banerjee v. Subodh Kumar Banerjee, (AIR 1964 SC 529) (supra) it was held : --
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 67 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Kunwar Basant Singh vs Kunwar Brijraj Saran Singh on 17 May, 1935
In Basant Singh v. Brij Raj Saran Singh, AIR 1935 PC 132, which was a case where the testator was only 37 years of age but did not provide for anyting to the widow and the Will was not registered it was held there is no unusual about its non-registration. The relevant portion is quoted hereunder : --
Section 68 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 103 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 68 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
H. Venkatachala Iyengar vs B. N. Thimmajamma & Others on 13 November, 1958
16. The proof of Will has always been the topic of discussion by the various courts in large number of judicial pronouncements. True legal position in the matter of proof of
the Will has been dealt with precision in the case H. Ventakachala Iyengar v. B.N. Thimmajamma, AIR 1959 SC 443, the relevant portion of which is quoted below : --