Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (2.78 seconds)
M.W.Mohiuddin vs Boopathi on 18 September, 2025 cites

Sunita Devi vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 9 July, 2013

5.2. The accused is aged about 34 years and he has one child and he has not involved in further offence and considering the mitigating circumstances, and following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sunita Devi Vs. State of Bihar and another reported in 2014 SCC Online SC 984, 2025 INSC 1014 (K.Ponnammal Vs. State) and also taken into account that the victim received the compensation and he also not interested in prosecuting the case and the accused also regularly appearing before the Court for the past seven years and also on the reiterated the principle of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of 4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/11/2025 07:21:10 pm ) Suo Motu TR.(MD).No. 12539 of 2025 M.W.Mohiuddin V. State of Maharashtra reported in (1995) 3 SCC 567 and B.G.Goswarmi V. Delhi Administration reported in (1974) 3 SCC 85 that delay itself amounts to punishment, which must weigh in sentencing and disposal, this court is inclined to impose fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with default sentence of two months simple imprisonment.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 11 - A K Trivedi - Full Document

Smt. K. Ponnamma vs The State Of Kerala & Ors on 17 March, 1997

5.2. The accused is aged about 34 years and he has one child and he has not involved in further offence and considering the mitigating circumstances, and following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sunita Devi Vs. State of Bihar and another reported in 2014 SCC Online SC 984, 2025 INSC 1014 (K.Ponnammal Vs. State) and also taken into account that the victim received the compensation and he also not interested in prosecuting the case and the accused also regularly appearing before the Court for the past seven years and also on the reiterated the principle of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of 4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/11/2025 07:21:10 pm ) Suo Motu TR.(MD).No. 12539 of 2025 M.W.Mohiuddin V. State of Maharashtra reported in (1995) 3 SCC 567 and B.G.Goswarmi V. Delhi Administration reported in (1974) 3 SCC 85 that delay itself amounts to punishment, which must weigh in sentencing and disposal, this court is inclined to impose fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with default sentence of two months simple imprisonment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 25 - Full Document

B. G. Goswami vs Delhi Administration on 4 May, 1973

5.2. The accused is aged about 34 years and he has one child and he has not involved in further offence and considering the mitigating circumstances, and following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sunita Devi Vs. State of Bihar and another reported in 2014 SCC Online SC 984, 2025 INSC 1014 (K.Ponnammal Vs. State) and also taken into account that the victim received the compensation and he also not interested in prosecuting the case and the accused also regularly appearing before the Court for the past seven years and also on the reiterated the principle of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of 4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/11/2025 07:21:10 pm ) Suo Motu TR.(MD).No. 12539 of 2025 M.W.Mohiuddin V. State of Maharashtra reported in (1995) 3 SCC 567 and B.G.Goswarmi V. Delhi Administration reported in (1974) 3 SCC 85 that delay itself amounts to punishment, which must weigh in sentencing and disposal, this court is inclined to impose fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with default sentence of two months simple imprisonment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 169 - K K Mathew - Full Document
1