Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.87 seconds)The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 65 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 138 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Akshay Atmaram Rathod (In Jail) vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary ... on 18 April, 2017
SANJAY by SANJAY
SHARMA
SHARMA Date: 2022.04.30
18:40:11 +0530
Announced in the open Court SANJAY SHARMA-II
on this 29th April, 2022 Addl. Sessions Judge-03 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
Crl. Revision No. 282/2021 to 286/2021
Akshay Kumar Jain vs. State & Anr. Page No. 13 of 14
Akshay Jain vs. State & Anr.
Piyush Jain & Anr vs Padam Chand Jain & Anr on 4 April, 2022
1. The criminal revision petitions under Section 397
of 'The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973' (In short 'Cr.P.C.')
are directed against order dated 20.08.2019 (In short 'the
impugned order') in complaint cases under Section 138 of
'The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881' (In short 'NI Act') vide
CC No. 16563/18, 16564/18, 16565/18, 16566/18 and 16567/18
titled as 'Piyush Jain vs. Ramesh Chand Jain & Ors.' whereby
Ld. MM (NI Act) - 02, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (In short
'the trial Court') summoned the petitioner.
1