Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.32 seconds)
Prateek Dubey vs M/S Jbk Developers Pvt. Ltd. on 1 September, 2017 cites

C.H. Vittal Reddy vs The Manager, District Co-Operative ... on 4 December, 2002

Initially when we  had confronted the ld counsel on the question of substantial delay in the matter he argued that since it is  a matter of refund it is a continues  cause of action. However, he has not been able to support his arguments with any ruling. Later he has filed an application praying for condonation of delay stating that the complainant being from a remote area could not  understand the implication of delay done which is bondafide and unintentional. We are not impressed with the arguments. The Hon'ble NCDRC in the matter of C.H. Vittal Ready Vs. The Manager, District decided on 04.12.02 is pleased to observe as under:
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 8 - Cited by 17 - Full Document

Shri Kaushal K. Rana vs Dlf Commercial Complexes Ltd. Main ... on 13 December, 2012

The ld counsel while arguing that the OP have defaulted and thus liable for compensation, has drawn our attention to the judgment of the Hon'ble NCDRC in the matter of  Kaushik K. Rana Vs. DLF  Commercial complexes Ltd. IV (2014) CPJ 287 holding that  the  builder guilty of providing deficient and delayed service has to refund the amount given by the complainant to the OP along with interest and cost. Hon'ble court penalized the builders with return of the total amount deposited along with interest, considering the malpractices and deficiency of the builder in providing the possession of the property and thereafter settling with reciprocated rate of interest.
Competition Commission of India Cites 8 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1