Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.22 seconds)Section 4 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Article 6 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
General Manager Finance Air India Ltd & ... vs Virender Singh on 16 July, 2012
Furthermore, High Court of Delhi in the decision of General Manager Finance Air India Ltd &
Anr v. Virender Singh, LPA No. 205/2012, Decided On: 16.07.2012 had held as under:
Venkatesh Nayak vs Directorate Of General Of Health ... on 5 June, 2020
It was observed by the Commission in earlier matter of Mr. Venkatesh Nayak vs. CPIO, Ministry
of Health & Family Welfare and Others, in Complaint No.:- CIC/MOHFW/C/2020/668909-BJ
+ CIC/DTGHS/C/2020/668913-BJ dated 05.06.2020, the Commission had advised as under:-
M/S S.J. And S.P. Family Trust vs Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest ... on 18 May, 2018
In this context, the Commission referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi
High Court in J P Aggarwal v. Union of India (WP (C) no. 7232/2009 wherein on the issue of
the duties and responsibilities of the CPIO, it was held that:
The Freedom Of Information Act, 2002
Mujibur Rehman vs Central Information Commission on 28 April, 2009
The Commission further observed that the RTI Act, 2005 stipulates time limits in its various
provisions relating to responding to RTI Applications, transfer of applications, filing and
disposing of first appeal to ensure that a culture of information dissemination is strengthened so
that a robust functioning of the democracy gets established. This was recognised by the Hon'ble
High Court of Delhi in Mujibur Rehman vs Central Information Commission (W.P. (C)
3845/2007)(Dated 28 April, 2009) wherein it was held as under:
Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011
The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of CBSE and Anr. Vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay
and Ors 2011 (8) SCC 497 held as under:
1