Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.41 seconds)
Ajay Kumar vs The Bses Yamuna Power Ltd on 12 July, 2024 cites

Employers In Relation To The Management ... vs The Presiding Officer, Central ... on 8 July, 1988

Even the observations of Hon'ble Patna High Court in Employers in Relation to... Vs. Presiding Officer, Central 1999 (47) BLJR 2105 were based on the judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Air India Statutory Corporation Vs. United Labour Unions and Ors. etc JT 1996(11) SC 170 and in Secretary, Haryana State Electricity Board's case (Supra).
Patna High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 17 - S B Sinha - Full Document

International Airport Authority Of ... vs International Air Cargo Workers' ... on 13 April, 2009

As regards extent of control and supervision, we have already taken note of the observations in Bengal Nagpur Cotton Mills case [Bengal Nagpur Cotton Mills v. Bharat Lal, (2011) 1 SCC 635 : (2011) 1 SCC (L&S) 16] , International Airport Authority of India case [International Airport Authority of India v. International Air Cargo Workers' Union, (2009) 13 SCC 374 : (2010) 1 SCC (L&S) 257] and Nalco case [NALCO Ltd. v. Ananta Kishore Rout, (2014) 6 SCC 756 : (2014) 2 SCC (L&S) 353]."
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 209 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

M/S Icici Prudential Asset Management ... vs Union Of India & Anr. on 25 August, 2011

50. Thus, in the absence of any reference on the aspect of the alleged contracts between management no. 1 and 2 to 4 being sham and bogus, this Court cannot go into the aforesaid question. A bare perusal of judgment of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in ICIC Prudential Asset Management Company Ltd (M/s) v. Union of India 2012 LLR 245 and judgment of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in M/s Prabha Engineering Private Ltd Vs. Sarva Mazdoor Sangh and Ors 2018 LLR 828, relied upon by Ld. AR for workman, shows that in both the aforesaid judgments Hon'ble High Courts were dealing with proceedings arising out of a reference requiring the Labour Court to adjudicate whether the contracts in the aforesaid cases between the principal employer and contractor were sham and bogus or not. Moreover, no evidence on the aforesaid issue has been led by the workman in the present case.
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - R S Endlaw - Full Document
1   2 3 Next